public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "satoru at 0xcc dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug libc/2683] dladdr() returns wrong symbol names in rare cases
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 05:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060528050412.18533.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060522145631.2683.satoru@0xcc.net>


------- Additional Comments From satoru at 0xcc dot net  2006-05-28 05:04 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Correct patch, I applied it to CVS.

Thank you for fixing the bug.

I just realized that completly skipping undefined references
could be a problem.  Consider the following code.

  #include <stdio.h>
  int main() {
      printf("%p\n", &printf);
      return 0;
  }

If I compile it without -fPIC on my machine (Debian GNU/Linux sarge on a x86_32
machine), 
&printf points to a memory address in PLT.

  % gcc test.c
  % ./a.out
  0x8048288

  % readelf -S a.out  |grep " \.plt"
  [11] .plt          PROGBITS        08048270 000270 000030 04  AX  0   0  4

The binary contains the undefined symbols for printf both in
.dysym and .symtab sections and the values of the undefined symbols
correspond to the memory address in PLT (0x8048288).

  % readelf --symbols a.out |grep printf
   2: 08048288    57 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND printf@GLIBC_2.0 (2)
  99: 08048288    57 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND printf@@GLIBC_2.0

Hence, to support dladdr(&printf, info) for non-pic binaries,
probably we need to allow the condition something like this as well.

  (ELFW(ST_TYPE) (symtab->st_info) == STT_FUNC
   && symtab->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF
   && match->l_addr + symtab->st_value == addr)


On the other hand, if I compile the same code with -fPIC,
&printf points to the printf definition in the map of glibc.
There is no problem in this case for doing dladdr(&printf, info).

  % gcc -fPIC test.c
  % ./a.out
  0x4006e8e0

  % ldd a.out
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001f000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
  % readelf --symbols /lib/libc.so.6|grep " printf"
   157: 0004f8e0    57 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   11       printf@@GLIBC_2.0

  % python
  >>> "%x" % (0x4001f000 + 0x0004f8e0)
  '4006e8e0'


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2683

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-28  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-22 14:57 [Bug libc/2683] New: " satoru at 0xcc dot net
2006-05-24 19:25 ` [Bug libc/2683] " drepper at redhat dot com
2006-05-28  5:04 ` satoru at 0xcc dot net [this message]
2006-08-24 20:20 ` drepper at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060528050412.18533.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).