public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
@ 2006-05-29 12:59 dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:00 ` [Bug libc/2705] " dmueller at suse dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dmueller at suse dot com @ 2006-05-29 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
Hi,
there is an ongoing vixie-cron exploit that I would like to have glibc warn
upon, because many more packages are affected.
for details see here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178431
--
Summary: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid
family
Product: glibc
Version: 2.4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: dmueller at suse dot com
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
@ 2006-05-29 13:00 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:57 ` meissner at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dmueller at suse dot com @ 2006-05-29 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dmueller at suse dot com 2006-05-29 13:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=1056)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1056&action=view)
(untested) patch
this should do it, will start testing now.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:00 ` [Bug libc/2705] " dmueller at suse dot com
@ 2006-05-29 13:57 ` meissner at suse dot de
2006-05-29 16:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: meissner at suse dot de @ 2006-05-29 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |meissner at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:00 ` [Bug libc/2705] " dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:57 ` meissner at suse dot de
@ 2006-05-29 16:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-05-29 16:49 ` dmueller at suse dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-05-29 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2006-05-29 16:32 -------
No, cannot be done. There are too many places where using these functions can
be expected to work all the time and no return value must be checked.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-29 16:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2006-05-29 16:49 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 16:51 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 19:44 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dmueller at suse dot com @ 2006-05-29 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dmueller at suse dot com 2006-05-29 16:49 -------
Thats exactly the point, they can not be expected to work all the time because
of user imposed ressource limits (nproc mainly) and this leads to
user-exploitable situations in root running daemons.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-29 16:49 ` dmueller at suse dot com
@ 2006-05-29 16:51 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 19:44 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dmueller at suse dot com @ 2006-05-29 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dmueller at suse dot com 2006-05-29 16:50 -------
BTW, it only is warning for -D_FORTIFY_CHECKS is defined, and which triggers
warnings already elsewhere (for write() (but not send()!) which produces
bazillion of most of the time useless warnings.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/2705] missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-29 16:51 ` dmueller at suse dot com
@ 2006-05-29 19:44 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-05-29 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2006-05-29 19:44 -------
Stop reopening bugs. You have no idea of the semantics is meant to be.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-29 19:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-29 12:59 [Bug libc/2705] New: missing warn-unused-result fortify checks for setuid family dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:00 ` [Bug libc/2705] " dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 13:57 ` meissner at suse dot de
2006-05-29 16:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-05-29 16:49 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 16:51 ` dmueller at suse dot com
2006-05-29 19:44 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).