From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9789 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 23:32:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9769 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2006 23:31:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060613233153.9768.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060609223502.2749.sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> References: <20060609223502.2749.sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug ports/2749] powerpc32 does not build --without-fp X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 23:31 ------- On the list of possible future projects for soft-fp in GCC http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Software%20floating%20point the problems with having soft-fp in both GCC and glibc are discussed. My suggested solution involves a GCC configure option --with-libc-soft-fp=glibc2.4 which causes the given set of soft-fp functions to be omitted from libgcc. The version number is needed since 2.4 has more such functions than 2.3, and something may also need to be done to get the functions exported from glibc (as of an older glibc version, various soft-fp functions ended up hidden, apparently because of libgcc-compat.S, rather than exported from the shared libc). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2749 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.