public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug ports/2749] powerpc32 does not build --without-fp
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060915140840.6132.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060609223502.2749.sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>


------- Additional Comments From sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com  2006-09-15 14:08 -------
Update: David Edelsohn provided version of darwin-ldouble with a fmsub
implementation based on the soft-fp quad support macros. This was required to
produce the 106 intermediate result from the multiple to the final subtract.

Unfortunately the expansion of FP_SUB_Q produced incorrect results. Final
tracted this down to the __FP_FRAC_SUB_4 macro from op-4.h. The current version
does not propagate the borrows correctly for the 3rd anf 4th words. Corrected
this and we are see a big improvement in the results. Because IBM extented is
only gives 106 vs 113 for for IEEE we are seeing ULPS failures up to 8 bits, but
this expected for IBM extented and equivalent to hardware IBM extented results.
This is fixed in the no-fpu/libm-test-ulps.

Net test-float and test-double are clean and test-ldouble is down to 18 failures
(mostly incorrect sign of 0.0 or inf). Debugging continues but good progress.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2749

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-15 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-09 22:35 [Bug ports/2749] New: " sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-09 22:38 ` [Bug ports/2749] " sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-09 22:43 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-09 22:48 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-09 22:50 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-13 21:45 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-13 21:53 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-13 22:42 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-13 22:53 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-06-13 23:32 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-15  9:40 ` balkohen at gmail dot com
2006-08-04 21:48 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 21:52 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 21:54 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 21:59 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 22:02 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 22:06 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 22:12 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-04 22:36 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-07 19:17 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-07 19:19 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-08-07 19:24 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-07 20:59 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 14:08 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com [this message]
2006-09-15 15:11 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 15:15 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 16:26 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-15 19:46 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 20:07 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-15 20:42 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 20:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-15 21:07 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2006-09-15 21:28 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-15 21:34 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 21:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-15 23:06 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-15 23:07 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-21 22:25 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-21 22:44 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-26 21:03 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-26 21:27 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-09-28 16:05 ` bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com
2006-10-05 21:16 ` jdub at us dot ibm dot com
2006-11-14 17:00 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-14 17:33 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2006-11-14 17:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-11-22 15:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-12 19:11 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-01-12 19:16 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-01-15 21:55 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-01-15 21:56 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-01-15 23:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-17 13:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-17 21:47 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-01-23 14:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-26 22:04 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-02-26 22:06 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-02-26 22:08 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-02-27 14:25 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-02-27 14:28 ` sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com
2007-07-12 14:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060915140840.6132.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).