From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12603 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2006 07:47:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 12584 invoked by uid 48); 21 Sep 2006 07:47:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060921074706.12583.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "sebastien dot decugis at ext dot bull dot net" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050216100034.746.sebastien.decugis@ext.bull.net> References: <20050216100034.746.sebastien.decugis@ext.bull.net> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/746] sigaction SA_RESETHAND flag does not set SA_NODEFER X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From sebastien dot decugis at ext dot bull dot net 2006-09-21 07:47 ------- Hi Michael, At the time of the testing I was concerned about the conformance of the NPTL implementation to the POSIX standard. I may have tried the tests on a couple of other implementations, but I did not keep track of these. Even though POSIX standardizes existing practices, this happens at the time when the POSIX standard is being defined. Once it has been written, I think an implementation must conform to what is written, or it is not fully POSIX-conformant. Anyway if you feel the POSIX standard is not suitable on this point, there are mailing lists to submit changes and fix to the standard. Best regards, seb. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=746 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.