From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7751 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 20:07:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 7670 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 20:07:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061031200747.7669.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drow at sources dot redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20061011094058.3335.mkl@pengutronix.de> References: <20061011094058.3335.mkl@pengutronix.de> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug ports/3335] In function `__getcwd': undefined reference to `MAX' X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-10-31 20:07 ------- Subject: Re: In function `__getcwd': undefined reference to `MAX' On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:06:19PM -0000, vapier at gentoo dot org wrote: > ive seen this failure in a couple of ports ... i dont really care to try and > track down the implicit include path in every one as simply including the header > that defines MAX() in the file that uses MAX() seems a lot saner to me One of these fixes we have the option to commit at all; the other we don't. I'll take building over not building any day. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.