From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16486 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2006 17:42:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16350 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2006 17:42:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061114174243.16349.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060609223502.2749.sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> References: <20060609223502.2749.sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug ports/2749] powerpc32 does not build --without-fp X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-11-14 17:42 ------- Subject: Re: powerpc32 does not build --without-fp On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com wrote: > Yes the ulps will vary with the optimization, for example -O2 vs -Os will give > different results. And there are additional difference between gcc-4.1.1 and > gcc-4.2. Which where you testing? 4.1 (branches/csl/sourcerygxx-4_1, which has a soft-fp backport, so using the non-macro-expanded version of fmsub from the 4.2 patch). I will be working on getting E500 working with long double as well (unfortunately E500 support has got somewhat bitrotten in GCC, so sharing fixes between 4.1/4.2/4.3 there will be more difficult). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2749 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.