* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
@ 2006-09-27 17:00 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-10-02 8:38 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-09-27 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2006-09-27 17:00 -------
Then don't use dash. bash is the only supported shell.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
2006-09-27 17:00 ` [Bug libc/3266] " drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2006-10-02 8:38 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
2007-07-04 15:44 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: sqweek at gmail dot com @ 2006-10-02 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sqweek at gmail dot com 2006-10-02 08:38 -------
Created an attachment (id=1342)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1342&action=view)
Fix ldd to rely on its proper interpreter
Works for me, so long as ldd stops claiming to be POSIX compatible.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
2006-09-27 17:00 ` [Bug libc/3266] " drepper at redhat dot com
2006-10-02 8:38 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
@ 2007-07-04 15:44 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
2007-07-04 15:47 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: richardvoigt at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-04 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From richardvoigt at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 15:44 -------
Do you really think it is appropriate for the C runtime library to dictate which
shells need to be installed? That kind of dependency seems very backwards.
Note that one effect of this decision is to make ldd worthless on a busybox system.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |richardvoigt at gmail dot
| |com
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 15:44 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
@ 2007-07-04 15:47 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
2007-07-04 16:47 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: richardvoigt at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-04 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From richardvoigt at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 15:47 -------
Anyway, I have a much shorter, much cleaner patch:
# environments where the executed program might not have permissions
# to write to the console/tty. But only bash 3.x supports the pipefail
# option, and we don't bother to handle the case for older bash versions.
-if set -o pipefail 2> /dev/null; then
+if (set -o pipefail) 2> /dev/null; then
+ set -o pipefail
try_trace() {
eval $add_env '"$@"' | cat
}
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 15:47 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
@ 2007-07-04 16:47 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2007-07-04 17:53 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2007-07-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2007-07-04 16:46 -------
Stop reopening. bash is the only supported shell. Maintain your own changes if
you must but stop burdening others.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 16:47 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2007-07-04 17:53 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
2010-07-30 11:56 ` a4239214 at bofthew dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: richardvoigt at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-04 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From richardvoigt at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 17:53 -------
Just FYI -- I've never before reopened this bug. If you are finding that the
bug keeps being opened, then it is something that a lot of your users care
about, not the same user bugging you continually.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 17:53 ` richardvoigt at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-30 11:56 ` a4239214 at bofthew dot com
2010-07-30 12:02 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2010-08-09 18:39 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: a4239214 at bofthew dot com @ 2010-07-30 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From a4239214 at bofthew dot com 2010-07-30 11:56 -------
This is stupid.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-30 11:56 ` a4239214 at bofthew dot com
@ 2010-07-30 12:02 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2010-08-09 18:39 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-30 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2010-07-30 12:02 -------
See #c5.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3266] ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash
2006-09-26 16:02 [Bug libc/3266] New: ldd doesn't work when /bin/sh is dash sqweek at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-30 12:02 ` jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2010-08-09 18:39 ` sqweek at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: sqweek at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-09 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sqweek at gmail dot com 2010-08-09 18:38 -------
i agree, that the assumption /bin/sh is bash continues to be deemed correct IS
incredibly stupid. "all the world's a vax" -> "all the shs are bash".
if you don't want to support other shells, that is FINE and understandable. just
ask the kernel for what you actually want, /bin/bash.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread