* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-01-25 22:17 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-02-17 7:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-01-25 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
GCC target triplet| |x86
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-01-25 22:17 ` [Bug libc/3924] " olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-02-17 7:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2007-04-17 21:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2007-02-17 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2007-02-17 07:18 -------
Provide example code. As I wrote on the list already, I don't see anything
wrong. The alignment is needed and is correctly expressed for the unwinder.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-01-25 22:17 ` [Bug libc/3924] " olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-02-17 7:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2007-04-17 21:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-05-16 17:36 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-04-17 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From olsajiri at gmail dot com 2007-04-17 22:05 -------
Created an attachment (id=1726)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1726&action=view)
example code
create an shared library 'libaudit.so' from the source and run:
LD_AUDIT=<PATH>/libaudit.so /bin/ls
this segfaults for me most of the time
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-17 21:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-05-16 17:36 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-08-09 20:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-05-16 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-16 17:36 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-08-09 20:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-08-14 19:17 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-08-09 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-09 20:05 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-08-14 19:17 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-08-24 2:58 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-08-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P1
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-14 19:17 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-08-24 2:58 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2007-08-27 20:20 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-10-07 5:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2007-08-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2007-08-24 02:58 -------
Fixed in cvs. Your patch is not correct.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-24 2:58 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2007-08-27 20:20 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
2007-10-07 5:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: olsajiri at gmail dot com @ 2007-08-27 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From olsajiri at gmail dot com 2007-08-27 20:20 -------
The example code is still not working with the fixed libc code.
Regarding the framesizep output agrument of la_i86_gnu_pltenter function:
If there's a framesizep set to any value but zero, the ls binary will segfault.
If there's a framesizep set to zero value, the ls binary will run without errors.
Does the example code work ok for you?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/3924] LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting
2007-01-25 21:49 [Bug libc/3924] New: LD_AUDIT implementation causing process segfaulting olsajiri at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-27 20:20 ` olsajiri at gmail dot com
@ 2007-10-07 5:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2007-10-07 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2007-10-07 05:32 -------
There was another little bug in the code which I fixed. But an equally bad bug
is that you test module is requesting too large stack frames. Unless I reduced
the size to something more reasonable the copy operation will sometimes/often
segfault. Current cvs has all the changes.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread