From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12042 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2007 14:41:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 11986 invoked by uid 48); 27 Oct 2007 14:41:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071027144100.11985.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "aj at suse dot de" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20070403212942.4314.hermantenbrugge@home.nl> References: <20070403212942.4314.hermantenbrugge@home.nl> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/4314] memcpy performance problem X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From aj at suse dot de 2007-10-27 14:40 ------- We do use for i686 an optimized memcpy implementation written in assembler. I see the same performance difference on my system as you do. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-10-27 14:40:59 date| | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4314 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.