[Bug libc/5807] New: strlen() not effective

["egmont at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

Most of the functions similar to strlen() that have to detect whether any bytes
of an integer is zero are very efficient. However, in glibc-2.7/string/strlen.c
this efficient code that's used in lots of other functions is surrounded by an
#if 0, and instead a trivial code is used which exits the loop and examines each
bytes separately if any of the bytes is within the range 129-255 or 0. That is
roughly 15/16 of all random cases in 4-bit architecture and even more in 8-bit.
Hence I think this function is hardly any more efficient than if you read one
long int and then simply examined all its bytes separately.

Is there any reason for the code that looks way more effective and is being used
in many other source files to be commented out here?

-- 
           Summary: strlen() not effective
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: egmont at gmail dot com
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5807

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.