From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1357 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2008 00:10:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1186 invoked by uid 48); 30 Mar 2008 00:09:55 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080330000955.1185.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080329211738.5997.jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20080329211738.5997.jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug math/5997] Very slow execution of sinf function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 00:09 ------- On a openSUSE 11.0alpha3, x86_64, glibc 2.7 (20071106 system, the sinf() calls the ../sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sincosf.c:175 FPU function whereas on a Fedora 8 system with glibc 2.7 the ../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/s_sinf.c, line 29 software implementation of sinf is called. Any suggestions on how to fix this. We should be using the FPU calls. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5997 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.