From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21945 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2008 13:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21835 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2008 13:44:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080617134416.21834.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dak at gnu dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080515091307.6522.dak@gnu.org> References: <20080515091307.6522.dak@gnu.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/6522] abort should not be marked noreturn X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From dak at gnu dot org 2008-06-17 13:44 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > The compiler provides a noreturn attribute for abort automatically. > Whether the header provides it doesn't matter unless you use > -fno-builtin-abort. That would suggest that this report should better have been filed with GCC than with glibc since it would seem that a header change will usually not make a dfference. Thanks for that information, appreciated. Now I can move elsewhere in order to let my head bashed in. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6522 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.