public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "grugh at centrum dot cz" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug math/5781] Slow sine function for special values on AMD64 - second attempt Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:17:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080714141653.16149.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20080221091038.5781.grugh@centrum.cz> ------- Additional Comments From grugh at centrum dot cz 2008-07-14 14:16 ------- I'm not the only one with such problems: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5997 I assume that for the 64-bit distribution (x86_64), it should use sin and sinf from i386 arch (sysdeps\i386\fpu\s_sin.S and sysdeps\i386\fpu\s_sinf.S) and only sinl implementation is explicit x86_64. But the sin and sinf are now used as software versions (IBM library). And it's usually bit slower, sometimes MUCH MORE slower (1000x). IBM library is perhaps only emergency implementation (if there is no hw support) and it's not used for "better" (<= 0.5ULP) precision. "The First Step is to Admit You Have a Problem!" -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5781 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 14:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-02-21 9:11 [Bug math/5781] New: " grugh at centrum dot cz 2008-02-21 9:39 ` [Bug math/5781] " jakub at redhat dot com 2008-02-21 17:10 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-21 17:43 ` jakub at redhat dot com 2008-02-22 9:01 ` grugh at centrum dot cz 2008-07-14 14:17 ` grugh at centrum dot cz [this message] [not found] <bug-5781-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2012-02-29 20:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-01 12:54 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com 2013-04-10 4:25 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com 2013-12-03 18:40 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-05 21:07 ` john.wilkinson at spirent dot com 2014-02-06 7:40 ` john.wilkinson at spirent dot com 2014-02-06 15:48 ` carlos at redhat dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080714141653.16149.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).