public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kkylheku at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/1128] Malloc not trimming filled-up sbrk space causes unnecessary system call overhead Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:07:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080718200708.10506.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050727134634.1128.jp-www@dcs.gla.ac.uk> ------- Additional Comments From kkylheku at gmail dot com 2008-07-18 20:07 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I think it would not fix the following (IMHO in practice more likely) situation: > 1. lot's of malloc/free from the main arena > 2. a single sbrk(+something) call from the app IMHO, apps that call sbrk deserve less than optimal behavior from malloc, such as memory not being returned when it is freed. > 3. lot's of free() from the main arena > -- now every free() can still incur an > sbrk(0) call because the end of the main arena never can pass the user- allocated > space > I think the proper fix would be to prevent or alleviate the sbrk(0) in every > free(), given that sbrk(0) is very expensive (but see below). But, seeing below, it is successfully argued that sbrk(0) is actually not expensive at all thanks to cashing. The remaining problem is that the freed memory won't be returned to the operating system. But the application arguably deserves that, because it interfered with malloc by calling sbrk (+delta). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1128 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 20:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-07-27 13:46 [Bug libc/1128] New: " jp-www at dcs dot gla dot ac dot uk 2008-03-28 5:55 ` [Bug libc/1128] " kkylheku at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 6:01 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 17:45 ` bugzilla1 at malloc dot de 2008-03-28 18:05 ` bugzilla1 at malloc dot de 2008-07-18 20:07 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com [this message] 2008-07-20 19:42 ` jp-www at dcs dot gla dot ac dot uk 2009-10-01 12:03 ` simberger at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 12:20 ` simberger at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 17:15 ` bugzilla1 at malloc dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080718200708.10506.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).