From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15318 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2008 22:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 13423 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2008 22:04:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080805220453.13422.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "kreckel at ginac dot de" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20070112233054.3866.kreckel@ginac.de> References: <20070112233054.3866.kreckel@ginac.de> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug math/3866] pow(double, double) does not fulfil several of C99's requirements X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From kreckel at ginac dot de 2008-08-05 22:04 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 4) pow(-0, -1e100) > > this problem seems to be absent on glibc 2.8. There, pow(-0, -1e100) does the > right thing, returning -Inf and giving EDOM/FE_DIVBYZERO. But the right thing to do would return +Inf and giving EDOM/FE_DIVBYZERO, as -1e100 is < 0 and not an odd integer (specified in. F.9.4.4, second dash.) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3866 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.