From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9573 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2008 17:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9486 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2008 17:33:48 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081130173348.9485.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20081126155626.7057.udig@il.ibm.com> References: <20081126155626.7057.udig@il.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/7057] pthread rwlock does not implement 'writer preferred' option X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com 2008-11-30 17:33 ------- Uli I think this question deserves a more complete explanation. This seems like a reasonable request. If you disagree then it would not hurt to explain why. There seems to be a valid concern related to reliable implementation of recursive read locks with writer priority. As in this discusion: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-01/msg00055.html If this your concern then saying so would help resolve/close this issue. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bmark at us dot ibm dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7057 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.