From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8540 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2009 01:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 8516 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2009 01:22:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090114012200.8515.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tom dot honermann at oracle dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20070704013541.4737.nmiell@comcast.net> References: <20070704013541.4737.nmiell@comcast.net> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/4737] fork is not async-signal-safe X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From tom dot honermann at oracle dot com 2009-01-14 01:21 ------- The IEEE Austin group will be meeting on Thursday 5-Jan-2009 at 4:00PM GMT to discuss (amongst other things) removing fork() from the list of async-signal-safe functions as defined by the IEEE 1003.1 POSIX/SUS specs. Participation in the meeting is open to anyone - phone numbers are available at the Austin group website in the calendar entry for this meeting (https://www.opengroup.org/austin/calendar). Anyone wishing to have a voice in this discussion is urged to dial in and share your thoughts. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4737 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.