From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-10675-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2377 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2010 16:09:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 2321 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2010 16:08:56 -0000
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:09:00 -0000
From: "hideaki at sogetthis dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20100109160855.11155.hideaki@sogetthis.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/11155] New: fstat broken on sparc64
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

Calling fstat() in a C program compiled for sparc32 will eventually lead to the
'fstat64' syscall being made - as observed with 'strace'.
However, when compiled with -m64, strace shows that the inferior 'fstat' syscall
is executed, thereby giving a zero nanosecond part.

-- 
           Summary: fstat broken on sparc64
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.10
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: hideaki at sogetthis dot com
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
 GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11155

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.