From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13115 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2010 15:23:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 13020 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2010 15:23:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100121152301.13019.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "eero dot tamminen at nokia dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20100115110434.11177.andris.zeila@accenture.com> References: <20100115110434.11177.andris.zeila@accenture.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/11177] LD_AUDIT doesn't work with shared libraries containing no code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From eero dot tamminen at nokia dot com 2010-01-21 15:23 ------- Created an attachment (id=4548) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4548&action=view) readelf -S /usr/lib/libicudata.so.38.1 (Debian Stable) (In reply to comment #3) > The /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 is miscompiled. Attached is the output of "readelf -S /usr/lib/libicudata.so.38.1" from Debian stable and it definitely doesn't have a text section. Here are its sources and packaging: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libicu38 There are no bug reports on Debian about building libicudata: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libicu38;dist=stable > I don't see this in the version on my machine and it should never happen. What sections you have in that library on RedHat? And anyway... LD_AUDIT asserting on something that the dynamic linker accepts sounds dubious. Either the dynamic linker should assert already on linking this kind of a library or LD_AUDIT should only give a warning. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11177 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.