public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
@ 2009-08-16 13:28 aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2009-08-16 13:28 ` [Bug ports/10528] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-08-16 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

SOCK_NONBLOCK on alpha does not match the kernel value as the default value is 
not used on this architecture. It needs its own version of bits/socket.h.

Patch will follow.

-- 
           Summary: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ports
        AssignedTo: roland at gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: aurelien at aurel32 dot net
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
 GCC build triplet: alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: alpha-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
  2009-08-16 13:28 [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-08-16 13:28 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-02-13 10:08 ` [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-08-16 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net  2009-08-16 13:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=4138)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4138&action=view)
Patch to fix the problem


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
  2009-08-16 13:28 [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2009-08-16 13:28 ` [Bug ports/10528] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2010-02-13 10:08 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-02-13 10:09 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-03-23 15:24 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2010-02-13 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net  2010-02-13 10:07 -------
SOCK_CLOEXEC is also affected, new patch will follow

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match|SOCK_CLOEXEC and
                   |the kernel value            |SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match
                   |                            |the kernel value


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
  2009-08-16 13:28 [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2009-08-16 13:28 ` [Bug ports/10528] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-02-13 10:08 ` [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2010-02-13 10:09 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-03-23 15:24 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2010-02-13 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net  2010-02-13 10:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=4595)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4595&action=view)
New patch


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #4138 is|0                           |1
           obsolete|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
  2009-08-16 13:28 [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value aurelien at aurel32 dot net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-02-13 10:09 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2010-03-23 15:24 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-23 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-23 15:24 -------
I have applied a patch for this issue as discussed on libc-ports.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value
       [not found] <bug-10528-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-07-01  7:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-07-01  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10528

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fweimer at redhat dot com
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-01  7:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-16 13:28 [Bug ports/10528] New: SOCK_NONBLOCK does not match the kernel value aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-08-16 13:28 ` [Bug ports/10528] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2010-02-13 10:08 ` [Bug ports/10528] SOCK_CLOEXEC and " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2010-02-13 10:09 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2010-03-23 15:24 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-10528-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-07-01  7:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).