public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/11279] New: S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L
@ 2010-02-13 10:43 aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-02-13 10:44 ` [Bug libc/11279] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-04-04  8:51 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2010-02-13 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

the S_ISSOCK macro has been introduced in POSIX 2001, but this changed is not
reflected in <stat.h>. Patch will follow.

-- 
           Summary: S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE
                    >=200112L
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: aurelien at aurel32 dot net
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11279

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/11279] S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L
  2010-02-13 10:43 [Bug libc/11279] New: S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2010-02-13 10:44 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-04-04  8:51 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2010-02-13 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net  2010-02-13 10:43 -------
Created an attachment (id=4596)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4596&action=view)
Patch to fix the problem


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11279

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/11279] S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L
  2010-02-13 10:43 [Bug libc/11279] New: S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L aurelien at aurel32 dot net
  2010-02-13 10:44 ` [Bug libc/11279] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2010-04-04  8:51 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-04  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2010-04-04 08:51 -------
I applied a correct patch.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11279

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-04  8:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-13 10:43 [Bug libc/11279] New: S_ISSOCK macro not defined when _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=200112L aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2010-02-13 10:44 ` [Bug libc/11279] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2010-04-04  8:51 ` drepper at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).