public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tom at atoptech dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/11044] malloc dynamic mmap threshold causes 50%-100% increase in memory usage Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:09:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100407170920.14248.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20091202183137.11044.tom@atoptech.com> ------- Additional Comments From tom at atoptech dot com 2010-04-07 17:09 ------- Ulrich, I filed this bug to show, at least for our application, this change did not result in improved performance. To the contrary, this change increase memory fragmentation and in some case, memory usage when from 32GB to 64GB when running our application. Our application ran fine on RedHat release 3 and 4. When we ported to release 5, memory usage increased with out reason. From our standpoint we would like the compute platform to be stable from one release to the next. All I wanted to point out was that after reading the patch comments for this change, such as, + The threshold goes up in value when the application frees memory that was + allocated with the mmap allocator. The idea is that once the application + starts freeing memory of a certain size, it's highly probable that this is + a size the application uses for transient allocations. This estimator + is there to satisfy the new third requirement. seem to me; weakly justifiable. Some applications may exhibit this behavior, however, our application does not. And if one going to try and dynamically adjust the mmap threshold, one should keep adjusting the mmap threshold over the lifetime of the process and not clamp it so early, i.e., based upon the first free... Regards, Tom Geocaris -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11044 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 17:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-12-02 18:31 [Bug libc/11044] New: " tom at atoptech dot com 2010-04-05 5:08 ` [Bug libc/11044] " drepper at redhat dot com 2010-04-05 16:10 ` tom at atoptech dot com 2010-04-05 18:32 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2010-04-05 18:35 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2010-04-07 17:09 ` tom at atoptech dot com [this message] [not found] <bug-11044-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2014-02-16 17:43 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com 2014-05-28 19:46 ` schwab at sourceware dot org 2014-06-30 20:35 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100407170920.14248.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).