public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tore at fud dot no" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/11438] Please assign global scope to RFC 1918 addresses in getaddrinfo() Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:23:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100416092325.23750.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20100328154610.11438.tore@fud.no> ------- Additional Comments From tore at fud dot no 2010-04-16 09:23 ------- Hi Ulrich, and thanks for your feedback. I've brought the problem up with a couple of major distributions (Fedora and Ubuntu), and they've both applied the change, so it will be part of both Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. I've also just realised that the current practise of assigning non-global scope to rfc1918-addreses is more broken than what I first thought - if a host has only link-local IPv6 addresses in addition to (NAT-ed) RFC1918 IPv4 addresses, the link-local IPv6 address will be preferred for the outbound connection to a dual-stacked server with (both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses globally scoped). I had to read rule 2 in RFC3484 many times before actually believing this is the RFC- mandated behaviour. But even if it is, it is obivously not the right thing to do. So I'm hoping that in light of this you might reconsider making the change prior to the completion of the IETF standardisation process. I could attempt to persuade all the distributors to carry the change locally, but given the multitude of distributions out there I think it would be much more efficient to simply fix it in glibc centrally. Thanks for your time! Best regards, Tore Anderson -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11438 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-16 9:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-03-28 15:46 [Bug libc/11438] New: " tore at fud dot no 2010-03-28 15:47 ` [Bug libc/11438] " tore at fud dot no 2010-04-04 1:08 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2010-04-16 9:23 ` tore at fud dot no [this message] 2010-04-16 13:27 ` drepper at redhat dot com [not found] <bug-11438-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-16 13:01 ` chiel at gmx dot net
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100416092325.23750.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).