From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28678 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2010 14:46:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 28604 invoked by uid 48); 30 Apr 2010 14:46:37 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100430144637.28603.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20100429220824.11558.robgnubug@hagopian.net> References: <20100429220824.11558.robgnubug@hagopian.net> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/11558] No way to set some options in /etc/resolv.conf X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2010-04-30 14:46 ------- The way it is how it always was. This code is ancient and there are likely very good reasons why it is that way. I really have no interest to second guess those decisions. You can quite easily have a preloaded object for all processes which sets the flag programmatically. Then you're on your own and you are responsible for the negative fallout and it's not the C library implementation's faults. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11558 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.