From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3396 invoked by alias); 13 May 2010 18:45:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3175 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2010 18:44:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100513184441.3174.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dvhltc at us dot ibm dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20100511184557.11588.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> References: <20100511184557.11588.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/11588] pthread condvars are not priority inheritance aware X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From dvhltc at us dot ibm dot com 2010-05-13 18:44 ------- It was brought to my attention that the Signed-off-by's in the patches attached and sent to libc-alpha are not appropriate for glibc development. This was just an artifact of my git usage, and I will correct in subsequent versions. May we discuss these as is, as we our foremost concern is agreeing on the proposed new condattr protocol APIs? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.