public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gulsenenginar at aol dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/10149] stack guard should lead with zero byte to gain protections from str* writes
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:00:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-10149-131-Iibn5XwCuu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-10149-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10149

Gulsen Engin <gulsenenginar at aol dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gulsenenginar at aol dot com

--- Comment #6 from Gulsen Engin <gulsenenginar at aol dot com> ---
$ ./gdb -nx -q --data-directory=data-directory ~/a.out -ex "set confirm off"
-ex "file -readnow ~/a.out" http://www-look-4.com/category/technology/
        Reading symbols from /home/simark/a.out...
        Reading symbols from ~/a.out...
        /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8098:
https://komiya-dental.com/shopping/safety-for-online-shopping/ internal-error:
void create_all_comp_units(dwarf2_per_objfile*): Assertion
`per_objfile->per_bfd->all_comp_units.empty ()' failed.
    http://www.iu-bloomington.com/health/health-and-cannabis/
    This is a recurring problem that exposes a design issue in the DWARF
    per-BFD sharing feature.  Things work well when loading a binary with
https://waytowhatsnext.com/crypto/bought-house-with-bitcoin/ 
    the same method (with/without index, with/without readnow) twice in a
    row.  But they don't work so well when loading a binary with different
    methods.  See this previous fix, for example:
    http://www.wearelondonmade.com/category/health/
        efb763a5ea35 ("gdb: check for partial symtab presence in
dwarf2_initialize_objfile")

    That one handled the case where the first load is normal (uses partial
    symbols) and the second load uses an index.
http://www.jopspeech.com/category/services/

    The problem is that when loading an objfile with a method A, we create a
    dwarf2_per_bfd and some dwarf2_per_cu_data and initialize them with the
    data belonging to that method. http://joerg.li/category/health/  When
loading another obfile sharing the
    same BFD but with a different method B, it's not clear how to re-use the
    dwarf2_per_bfd/dwarf2_per_cu_data previously created, because they
    contain the data specific to method A http://connstr.net/category/health/
$ ./gdb -nx -q --data-directory=data-directory ~/a.out -ex "set confirm off"
-ex "file -readnow ~/a.out" http://embermanchester.uk/category/health/
        Reading symbols from /home/simark/a.out...
        Reading symbols from ~/a.out...
        /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8098: internal-error:
void create_all_comp_units(dwarf2_per_objfile*): Assertion
http://www.slipstone.co.uk/category/health/ 
`per_objfile->per_bfd->all_comp_units.empty ()' failed.

    This is a recurring problem that exposes a design issue in the DWARF
http://www.logoarts.co.uk/category/services/ 
    per-BFD sharing feature.  Things work well when loading a binary with
    the same method (with/without index, with/without readnow) twice in a
    row.  But they don't work so well when
http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/category/tech/ loading a binary with different
    methods.  See this previous fix, for example:

        efb763a5ea35 ("gdb: check for partial symtab presence in
dwarf2_initialize_objfile")
     http://www.compilatori.com/category/health/
    That one handled the case where the first load is normal (uses partial
    symbols) and the second load uses an index.

    The problem is that when loading an objfile with a method A, we create a
    dwarf2_per_bfd and some dwarf2_per_cu_data and initialize them with the
    data belonging to that method.  When loading another obfile sharing the
    same BFD but with a different method B, it's not clear how to re-use the
    dwarf2_per_bfd/dwarf2_per_cu_data previously created, because they
    contain the data specific to method A
https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/health/health-and-cannabis/
$ ./gdb -nx -q --data-directory=data-directory ~/a.out -ex "set confirm off"
-ex "file -readnow ~/a.out"
        Reading symbols from /home/simark/a.out...
        Reading symbols from ~/a.out...
        /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8098: internal-error:
void create_all_comp_units(dwarf2_per_objfile*): Assertion
`per_objfile->per_bfd->all_comp_units.empty ()' failed.

    This is a recurring problem that exposes a design issue in the DWARF
    per-BFD sharing feature.  Things work well when loading a binary with
    the same method (with/without index, with/without readnow) twice in a
    row.  But they don't work so well when loading a binary with different
    methods.  See this previous fix, for example:

        efb763a5ea35 ("gdb: check for partial symtab presence in
dwarf2_initialize_objfile"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-10149-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-05-15 15:01 ` drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
2014-07-01 20:34 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-09-05  7:39 ` kimolsun2020 at yahoo dot com
2021-09-10 19:36 ` mehmetgelisin at aol dot com
2021-09-10 19:51 ` mark at klomp dot org
2021-10-09 11:00 ` gulsenenginar at aol dot com [this message]
2021-10-19  7:15 ` progonsaytu at gmail dot com
2021-10-21  6:45 ` bap.fayol at gmail dot com
2021-10-21 10:43 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2021-10-24 10:03 ` glassmtech at ukr dot net
2021-11-10 14:12 ` bryanmcsp at gmail dot com
2009-05-12 18:05 [Bug libc/10149] New: stack guard should lead with zero byte to gain protections from str* reads kees at outflux dot net
2009-05-14 21:50 ` [Bug libc/10149] stack guard should lead with zero byte to gain protections from str* writes kees at outflux dot net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-10149-131-Iibn5XwCuu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).