[Bug localedata/10580] New file for hr_HR localedata

["pasky at ucw dot cz" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10580

--- Comment #13 from Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz> 2013-02-17 00:13:28 UTC ---
Keld, of course using the newer standard makes sense; however, I'm not sure
what do you mean by "further implement" and how that differs from what I wrote.
If you are interested in discussing this further, I propose we move the
discussion to the mailing list where more people could follow it. (Note that I
myself don't have the time to pursue the issue itself, so it makes sense to
talk more about it only if someone intends to do anything about it.)

Dragan, I'm sorry, I missed the LC_COLLATE syntax error. Any reason why we
cannot use the unicode entity there instead?

Also, I'm wondering, how was testing of this locale done if it doesn't even
compile with glibc's localedef now? And which of the people that provided
support for the new locale actually tested it rather than just embraced the
idea?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.