From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5402 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2013 01:14:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5293 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jan 2013 01:14:01 -0000 From: "ldv at altlinux dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/11460] fts has no LFS support Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ldv at altlinux dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ldv at altlinux dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11460 Dmitry V. Levin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware |ldv at altlinux dot org |dot org | --- Comment #1 from Dmitry V. Levin 2013-01-11 01:14:00 UTC --- The only reasonable explanation for the fact that fts functions have no LFS support while related ftw functions have LFS support is that nobody has proposed a patch yet. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.