public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa)
[not found] <bug-11494-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-15 22:14 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 22:55 ` davem at davemloft dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-15 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos at systemhalted dot
| |org, davem at davemloft dot
| |net
AssignedTo|roland at gnu dot org |unassigned at sourceware
| |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa)
[not found] <bug-11494-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-15 22:14 ` [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-15 22:55 ` davem at davemloft dot net
2012-02-16 1:01 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2014-06-30 18:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: davem at davemloft dot net @ 2012-02-15 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #6 from David S. Miller <davem at davemloft dot net> 2012-02-15 22:50:21 UTC ---
This isn't the correct fix.
Like other platforms, sparc and hppa should provide the
compatability define:
#define O_FSYNC O_SYNC
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa)
[not found] <bug-11494-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-15 22:14 ` [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 22:55 ` davem at davemloft dot net
@ 2012-02-16 1:01 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2014-06-30 18:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: carlos at systemhalted dot org @ 2012-02-16 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware |carlos at systemhalted dot
|dot org |org
--- Comment #7 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2012-02-16 00:58:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This isn't the correct fix.
>
> Like other platforms, sparc and hppa should provide the
> compatability define:
>
> #define O_FSYNC O_SYNC
I agree.
On 2009-11-29 hppa defined O_FSYNC to be an alias for O_SYNC and thus fixed
this issue.
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc-ports.git;a=commitdiff;h=b8eca7ff8ca1cbc3e1d6bec2fed4213863fa441b
Given that Dave just committed his fix and hppa's fix has been in for several
years I'm marking this issue fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa)
[not found] <bug-11494-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-16 1:01 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
@ 2014-06-30 18:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-30 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa)
2010-04-13 13:28 [Bug libc/11494] New: " schizo at debian dot org
@ 2010-04-13 13:39 ` drepper at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-13 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|drepper at redhat dot com |roland at gnu dot org
Component|libc |ports
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-30 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-11494-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-15 22:14 ` [Bug ports/11494] bad FFSYNC definition for sparc (and hppa) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 22:55 ` davem at davemloft dot net
2012-02-16 1:01 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2014-06-30 18:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2010-04-13 13:28 [Bug libc/11494] New: " schizo at debian dot org
2010-04-13 13:39 ` [Bug ports/11494] " drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).