From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11976 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2014 19:22:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11911 invoked by uid 48); 20 Feb 2014 19:22:22 -0000 From: "gratian.crisan at ni dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/11588] pthread condvars are not priority inheritance aware Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: nptl X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.12 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gratian.crisan at ni dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 --- Comment #34 from Gratian Crisan --- (In reply to Darren Hart from comment #33) > I looked through this, and you appear to be correct. We didn't catch it in > testing as the test case only depended on reading and writing the > COND_PROTOCOL_INHERIT, which works as the shift was missing from both > locations. > > Oddly, I had observed what I thought was a similar error with the CLOCK_ID, > but after going through it realized it was just an optimization as the > CLOCK_ID is bit 0. Sadly, I didn't catch this while staring at the same code > :-( > > Nice catch John! > > Who wants to respin the patches? I can do it but it's going to take me a couple of days due to current workload. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.