public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp
[not found] <bug-11715-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-12-04 17:30 ` isoma at jellybaby dot net
2013-10-21 7:23 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: isoma at jellybaby dot net @ 2011-12-04 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11715
Tim B <isoma at jellybaby dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |isoma at jellybaby dot net
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp
[not found] <bug-11715-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-12-04 17:30 ` [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp isoma at jellybaby dot net
@ 2013-10-21 7:23 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-06-30 17:46 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-01-13 7:57 ` vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-21 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11715
Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |neleai at seznam dot cz
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp
[not found] <bug-11715-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-12-04 17:30 ` [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp isoma at jellybaby dot net
2013-10-21 7:23 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
@ 2014-06-30 17:46 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-01-13 7:57 ` vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-30 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11715
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp
[not found] <bug-11715-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-30 17:46 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2015-01-13 7:57 ` vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it @ 2015-01-13 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11715
vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P3
CC| |vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it ---
As per RFC5424, chapter 6, the field TIME-SECFRAC is optional.
And the meaning of "optional" is explained in RFC2119 chapter 5.
This basically means that:
1. it's OK if this field is missing
2. it's OK if this field is present
In either case, no piece of software should break upon submitting, delivering
or receiving such a message.
The ticket issuer should discuss with "whoever in charge"(tm) whether this is a
desirable enhancement or not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp
2010-06-17 20:46 [Bug libc/11715] New: " knareshtech at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-19 18:40 ` drepper at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2010-06-19 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2010-06-19 18:40 -------
The format used is the one which has been always used. This means consumers
expect this format and might break if the additional information is added. I
suspend this until someone with enough interest comes up with a scheme which
doesn't break anything.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11715
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-13 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-11715-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-12-04 17:30 ` [Bug libc/11715] syslog() does not include usecs in timestamp isoma at jellybaby dot net
2013-10-21 7:23 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-06-30 17:46 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-01-13 7:57 ` vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it
2010-06-17 20:46 [Bug libc/11715] New: " knareshtech at gmail dot com
2010-06-19 18:40 ` [Bug libc/11715] " drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).