From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30286 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 18:40:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30203 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2013 18:40:27 -0000 From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/11787] Program with large TLS segments fail. Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.18 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11787 --- Comment #38 from Carlos O'Donell 2013-05-22 18:40:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > Carlos, any update on this? > > We've just run into this problem again: java loading JNI code instrumented for > profiling created thread stack blocks that were too small. > > It would be *really* nice for glibc to just do the right thing and account for > __static_tls without users having to explicitly work around it (by adding > __static_tls to their requested stack size). I agree. No update on this yet. I'll see what I can do in the next week or so. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.