From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-16697-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14427 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2012 13:52:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 14196 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2012 13:52:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO sourceware.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:52:25 +0000
From: "siddhesh at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug stdio/1190] fgetc()/fread() behaviour is not POSIX compliant
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: stdio
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: siddhesh at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: siddhesh at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-1190-131-I95KkmfjSI@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-1190-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-1190-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1190

--- Comment #13 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> 2012-09-13 13:52:06 UTC ---
The change is quite simple, but a comment in fileops.c says that this behaviour
is retained for sysv compatibility:

...
int
_IO_new_file_underflow (fp)
     _IO_FILE *fp;
{
  _IO_ssize_t count;
#if 0
  /* SysV does not make this test; take it out for compatibility */
  if (fp->_flags & _IO_EOF_SEEN)
    return (EOF);
#endif

...

I'm not sure if this is valid anymore, so I'll try to find out what the current
status is, unless someone here already knows the answer.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.