public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-21 1:51 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 10:45 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libc |network
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 1:51 ` [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-19 10:45 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-10-18 11:38 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2012-12-19 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|drepper.fsp at gmail dot |unassigned at sourceware
|com |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 1:51 ` [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 10:45 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2013-10-18 11:38 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2013-10-19 23:49 ` dos at scarff dot id.au
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2013-10-18 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
I don't think it's reasonable to expect that res_send can be used to send
anything that isn't a DNS query. If you want to send DNS UPDATE messages, you
have to implement that on top of the socket API.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-18 11:38 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2013-10-19 23:49 ` dos at scarff dot id.au
2013-10-21 7:18 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dos at scarff dot id.au @ 2013-10-19 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
--- Comment #4 from Dean Scarff <dos at scarff dot id.au> ---
Thanks Florian - I realize it's a little optimistic expecting the resolver
library to work for non-QUERY messages.
However, I think there's already some separation in the resolver's high-level
routines (res_query and res_search) and res_send; the latter seems intended to
be message-agnostic. I think it's valuable for users of glibc if res_send can
preserve its generality - and doing so here is a small change. Please consider
this patch. :)
For portability I ended up implementing my own code for sending DNS messages
over sockets (years ago - this is quite an old bug!), just as you suggested.
But it's a shame since it duplicates much of the functionality already present
in most implementations of res_send.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-19 23:49 ` dos at scarff dot id.au
@ 2013-10-21 7:18 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-21 7:20 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-21 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |neleai at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #5 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
A more reasonable approach than adding update functionality to res_send would
be adding a high level routine, say res_update. Do you want to work on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-21 7:18 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
@ 2013-10-21 7:20 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2013-10-23 13:11 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-06-30 8:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2013-10-21 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Ondrej Bilka from comment #5)
> A more reasonable approach than adding update functionality to res_send
> would be adding a high level routine, say res_update. Do you want to work on
> this?
I think upstream already has support for DNS UPDATE, but we have been out of
sync for a long, long time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-21 7:20 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2013-10-23 13:11 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-06-30 8:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-23 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #7 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
> I think upstream already has support for DNS UPDATE,
> but we have been out of sync for a long, long time.
If there is equivalent functionality it should be used instead relying on
res_send which may not be portable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-23 13:11 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
@ 2014-06-30 8:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-30 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11950
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-30 8:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-11950-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 1:51 ` [Bug network/11950] res_send fails with ETIMEDOUT on successful DNS UPDATE jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 10:45 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-10-18 11:38 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2013-10-19 23:49 ` dos at scarff dot id.au
2013-10-21 7:18 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-21 7:20 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2013-10-23 13:11 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-06-30 8:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).