From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11589 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2013 17:31:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11523 invoked by uid 48); 17 Mar 2013 17:31:12 -0000 From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/12129] mallopt() M_MXFAST limit anomaly Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12129 Carlos O'Donell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlos at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 from Carlos O'Donell 2013-03-17 17:31:09 UTC --- Just ran into an orthogonal issue surrounding M_MXFAST recently and found this open issue. I fully agree with Michael, it is wrong to document the interface one way and have the implementation behave in another way. I would accept and review patches to fix this. I would also accept a patch to add M_MXFAST which is mising from manual/memory.texi, and as a first step would accept documenting the current implementations behaviour (that way the canonical docs match the man pages). -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.