From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23420 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2013 21:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23379 invoked by uid 48); 29 Aug 2013 21:46:05 -0000 From: "kees at outflux dot net" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/12189] __stack_chk_fail should not attempt a backtrace Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.12 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kees at outflux dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12189 Kees Cook changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #4 from Kees Cook --- Various people continue to contact me about fixing this problem in glibc. It's a real issue that makes offline analysis of stack smash detection harder to handle due to segfaults while unwinding corrupt stacks. I've attached a quick hack to make this work better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.