From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15208 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2014 19:59:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14067 invoked by uid 55); 1 Jul 2014 19:58:58 -0000 From: "keld at keldix dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/12349] Incorrect thousands separator and first weekday for eu_ES locale Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: keld at keldix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12349 --- Comment #11 from keld at keldix dot com --- On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:11:46AM +0000, myllynen at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12349 > > Marko Myllynen changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |myllynen at redhat dot com > > --- Comment #10 from Marko Myllynen --- > Perhaps there are certain locales where glibc is better maintained but in > general CLDR looks to have more experts involved. For example, in some cases > there are national initiatives which work directly with CLDR. This is not > surprising given the vendor independent nature of CLDR. Now that Microsoft has > also joined CLDR [1] as contributing partner (alongside with Google, IBM, and > others) it certainly looks like CLDR has notable momentum and should not be > ignored. > > 1) > http://unicode-inc.blogspot.com/2014/05/cldr-v26-open-for-data-submission.html Yes, we should not ignore CLDR. But there are also national initiatives that work directly with ISO on their national conventions, where they do not work directly with CLDR. CLDR is an American initiative and is very much dominated by US companies, as you also indicate. Best regards keld -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.