[Bug libc/12454] New: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[Bug libc/12454] New: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

           Summary: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622:
                    _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.13
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: cryptooctoploid@gmail.com


I've hit the following assert running glibc 2.13 on Linux x86_64:

Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!

This is caused by the following commit:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=968dad0ab1f367a087ff4ad503b511dd0c565adc

Reverting the commit "solves" the problem.

There are two ways to reproduce the problem on my machine.

1) Trying to start sage ( http://www.sagemath.org/ )
2) Changing outputs in mpd ( http://mpd.wikia.com )

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[allan at archlinux dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |allan at archlinux dot org

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #2 from Octoploid <cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com> 2011-02-05 19:43:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 5229
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5229
Don't call _dl_sort_fini if there is only one object. (part 2)

Only call _dl_sort_fini in dl-close.c if there is more than one object.

This patch fixes:

gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o /var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static
 -Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed  /var/tmp/glibc-build/csu/crt1.
o /var/tmp/glibc-build/csu/crti.o `gcc  --print-file-name=crtbegin.o`
/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static.o /var/tmp/glibc-build/dlfcn/libdl.a  
/var/tmp/glibc-build/libc.a -lgcc -lgcc_eh  /var/tmp/glibc-build/libc.a `gcc 
--print-file-name=crtend.o` /var/tmp/glibc-build/csu/crtn.o
/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static.o: In function `do_test':
/var/tmp/glibc/elf/tst-tls9.c:16: warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked
applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc v
ersion used for linking
GCONV_PATH=/var/tmp/glibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/:/var/tmp/glibc-build/:/var/tmp/glibc-build/dlfcn
 /var/t
mp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static  >
/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static.out
tst-tls9-static: dl-fini.c:38: _dl_sort_fini: Assertion `nmaps > 1' failed.
Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted'
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/tst-tls9-static.out] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/glibc/elf'

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[vapier at gentoo dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |toolchain at gentoo dot org

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[marconifabio@ubuntu-it.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

njin <marconifabio@ubuntu-it.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marconifabio@ubuntu-it.org
           See Also|                            |https://launchpad.net/bugs/
                   |                            |721469

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |carlos at systemhalted dot
                   |                            |org

--- Comment #3 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-02-18 20:31:51 UTC ---
I've also seen this on x86 with glibc 2.13 git trunk, where it effects the
testsuite causing tst-cancel24, tst-chk4, tst-chk5, tst-chk6, tst-lfschk4,
tst-lfschk5, and tst-lfschk6 to fail with "Inconsistency detected by ld.so:
dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!".

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[kees at outflux dot net]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #4 from Kees Cook <kees at outflux dot net> 2011-02-18 23:49:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 5253
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5253
combined fixes

Here's a combined version of the fixes that doesn't mess with indenting and has
the same effect.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #5 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-02-19 03:28:10 UTC ---
The patches attached to this issue still do not address why they are required,
and what's actually wrong with the code, or why the original commit is not
correct. Until those questions are addressed it is unlikely that this patch
will make it into glibc.

Can anyone answer "Why?"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[schwab@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2011-02-21 09:19:08 UTC ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2011-02/msg00002.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #7 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-02-21 16:12:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2011-02/msg00002.html

Andreas,

Thanks, this helped pinpoint the defect in the sysroot I was using. Rather than
getting an assert I get something useful now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[others1 at pervalidus dot net]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Frédéric L. W. Meunier <others1 at pervalidus dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |others1 at pervalidus dot
                   |                            |net

--- Comment #8 from Frédéric L. W. Meunier <others1 at pervalidus dot net> 2011-02-21 17:32:33 UTC ---
I patched glibc 2.13 git and recompiled it. I then compiled elfutils 0.152 and
recompiled prelink 20101123.

Running the prelink testsuite, one test failed:

../src/prelink -c ./prelink.conf -C ./prelink.cache --ld-library-path=.
--dynamic-linker=./ld-linux.so.2 -vm ./reloc11
../src/prelink: ./reloc11lib1.so: Could not parse `Inconsistency detected by
ld.so: dl-deps.c: 626: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

After that, running prelink, the usual "Could not find one of the dependencies"
for missing dependencies.

I have no idea why the test failed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |UNCONFIRMED
         AssignedTo|drepper.fsp at gmail dot    |carlos at systemhalted dot
                   |com                         |org
     Ever Confirmed|1                           |0

--- Comment #9 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-02-21 23:23:26 UTC ---
If the prelink testsuite is failing then I recommend contacting the prelink
developers and asking for their help in putting together a test case that
reproduces the problem.

Until this issue has a reduced test case it's going to be difficult to
determine what's wrong.

A reduced test case contains the *exact* steps to reproduce the problem, along
with source, and pre-processed source.

It is not acceptable to post-process a binary and say that the post-processed
binary fails. It could be a problem with the post-processing tool.

Could you please provide a reduced test case?

Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[others1 at pervalidus dot net]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #10 from Frédéric L. W. Meunier <others1 at pervalidus dot net> 2011-02-22 00:04:05 UTC ---
I don't know how to reproduce it without running prelink. Here, it can be
reproduced with the following, extracted from the testsuite.

A file named reloc10lib4.c with just

int dummy = 24;

$ gcc -shared -O2 -nostdlib -fpic -o reloc11lib1.so reloc10lib4.c

$ prelink reloc11lib1.so
prelink: reloc11lib1.so: Could not parse `Inconsistency detected by ld.so:
dl-deps.c: 626: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!'

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[vapier at gentoo dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vapier at gentoo dot org

--- Comment #11 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> 2011-02-22 01:30:28 UTC ---
if you `ldd` that file, do you get the same error ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[others1 at pervalidus dot net]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #12 from Frédéric L. W. Meunier <others1 at pervalidus dot net> 2011-02-22 01:53:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> if you `ldd` that file, do you get the same error ?

Yes, so no need to have prelink.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.02.22 15:04:27
         AssignedTo|carlos at systemhalted dot  |drepper.fsp at gmail dot
                   |org                         |com
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #13 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-02-22 15:04:27 UTC ---
Ulrich,

Could you please verify?

This reproduces for me on trunk and 2.13 on x86. 

Steps to reproduce:

cat > test.c <<EOF
int dummy=64;
EOF
gcc -shared -fpic -o libtest.so test.c

Observed output:
~~~
LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 /home/carlos/build/glibc/elf/ld.so ./libtest.so
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 626: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!
~~~

Expected output (created using system ld.so based on 2.12):
~~~
LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 /lib/ld-2.12.1.so ./libtest.so            
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00961000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0026f000)
        /lib/ld-2.12.1.so (0x00cdf000)
~~~

I have not done any analysis other than reproducing the problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[drepper.fsp at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> 2011-02-25 21:52:13 UTC ---
I used Andreas's patch which in any case is OK.  If this isn't the entire fix,
reopen.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Octoploid <cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #15 from Octoploid <cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com> 2011-02-26 07:40:18 UTC ---
Ulrich,
did you ever run Carlos testcase before closing this bug?
Apparently not, because the bug is still present even with Andreas'
patch applied.

Without Kees' patch (testcase from comment 10):
/libx32/ld-linux-x32.so.2 --list ./reloc11lib1.so
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 626: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!

With Kees' patch:
/libx32/ld-linux-x32.so.2 --list ./reloc11lib1.so
        statically linked

It's your code that is calling these (bogus) assertions.
Could you at least think about it for a few minutes before closing this 
bug again without a real fix in six weeks (which seems to be your average
latency lately)?.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jeff.chua.linux at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jeff.chua.linux at gmail
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #16 from Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux at gmail dot com> 2011-03-13 16:04:53 UTC ---
> It's your code that is calling these (bogus) assertions.
> Could you at least think about it for a few minutes before closing this 
> bug again without a real fix in six weeks (which seems to be your average
> latency lately)?.


Latest git pull (commit c6e13027abd4b9c2d694fb4d8b28ab8290ea5971) still not
fixed. Applying both Octoploid's part 1 and 2 fixed Vmware 7.1.3 below:

Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 626: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!


Thanks,
Jeff

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason.vas.dias at gmail dot
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #17 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com> 2011-04-25 19:59:58 UTC ---
still happening with 2.13 ( GIT checkout of @2011-04-04, 
'git checkout -f glibc-2.13' ) , for any shared object
for 32-bit sub-arch on x86_64, that is linked with '-nostdlib' :

1. 32-bit fails:
$ echo 'int r = 42;' > rc.c
$ gcc -m32 -shared -fPIC -o rc.so rc.c
$ /lib32/ld-2.13.so --list ./rc.so
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xf7757000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib32/libc.so.6 (0xf75d6000)
        /lib32/ld-2.13.so (0xf7758000)
$ gcc -m32 -shared -fPIC -nostdlib -o rc.so rc.c
$ /lib32/ld-2.13.so --list ./rc.so
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!

2. 64-bit (native arch) works:
$ gcc -shared -o rc.so -fPIC -nostdlib rc.c
$ ldd ./rc.so
        statically linked
$ gcc -shared -fPIC -o rc.so rc.c
$ /lib/ld-2.13.so --list ./rc.so
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff3a3ff000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fad662f9000)
        /lib/ld-2.13.so (0x00007fad668b5000)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #18 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com> 2011-04-26 13:20:13 UTC ---
Not sure if this is pertinent here, but I suspect so -
what I'm seeing is :
  o no problem if ld.so has no   'DT_RPATH' / 'DT_RPATH_LINK'
  o problem if using ld.so with  non-empty DT_RPATH / DT_RPATH_LINK 

$ objdump -x /lib64/ld-2.13.so | grep RPATH

^- this bug does NOT happen when using this loader:

$ echo 'int i = 42; ' > rc.c
$ gcc -o rc.so -shared -nostlib -fPIC rc.c
$ /lib64/ld-2.13.so --list ./rc.so
        statically linked

$ objdump -x /lib32/ld-2.13.so | grep RPATH
  RPATH               
/mnt/sda3/gcc/./gcc/32/:/mnt/sda3/gcc/./gcc/:/mnt/sda3/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc/32:/mnt/sda3/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc:/usr/lib32:/lib32

^- bug only happens using this loader :

$ gcc -m32 -o rc.so -shared -nostdlib -fPIC rc.c
$ /lib32/ld-2.13.so --list ./rc.so
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!


Now, in order to build any ld.so at all with an RPATH, you must be
somehow disabling this bit of code :
$ diff -U0 elf/dynamic-link.h~ elf/dynamic-link.h
--- elf/dynamic-link.h~ 2011-04-08 02:03:09.000000000 +0100
+++ elf/dynamic-link.h  2011-04-07 02:59:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -208,2 +208,3 @@
-  assert (info[DT_RUNPATH] == NULL);
-  assert (info[DT_RPATH] == NULL);
+  /*  assert (info[DT_RUNPATH] == NULL);
+      assert (info[DT_RPATH] == NULL);
+  */

Now, I remember being roundly upbraded by Uli for attempting something so
crazy, with something along the lines of "an RPATH setting for ld.so 
causes so many problems for the loader it never will be supported" - but
I've been building the 32-bit sub-architecture glibc (ONLY!) for x86_64
for years with these lines commented out, hoping to find (and maybe fix?)
any problems caused, and running 32-bit freeware such as mozilla plugins
against this 32-bit loader, with no problems (except this one!) found so
far. Yes, I can see how commenting out these lines would be crazy for
a NATIVE loader, but not for a sub-architecture loader such as 32-bit
on native 64-bit or vice versa.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[drepper.fsp at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> 2011-05-30 05:17:27 UTC ---
There is nothing to do here.  If you apply patches which you've told are not
acceptable and those are creating problems, then it is up to you to fix the
patches you apply.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[vapier at gentoo dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |

--- Comment #20 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> 2011-05-30 07:44:17 UTC ---
that isnt what is happening here.  people are running unmodified git trees and
hitting this nlist error.  some people might be testing patches in an attempt
to address the original problem, but those patches arent the cause.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #21 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com> 2011-05-30 11:40:41 UTC ---
Sorry if my previous Comment #18 in any way deterred Ulrich from applying
something like Kee's patch of Comment #4, which makes perfect sense to
me and which is really needed to fix this bug - please, Ulrich, if
you haven't already done so, apply something like attachment #5253
of Comment #4.

What happened in my case was that I first compiled the unmodified glibc-2.13
in 32-bit mode, and noticed this problem, and others caused by the sub-arch
loader not having an RPATH . So I applied my usual "allow RPATH on ld.so"
patch and rebuilt, fixing some problems, but leaving this one, which occurs
when
using any non-native-system ld.so (NOT /lib/ld-linux.so.1) with  '-nostdlibs' .

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #22 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com> 2011-05-30 12:02:23 UTC ---
typo in previous Comment #21: non-native-system ld.so (NOT /lib/ld-linux.so.1)
with  '-nostdlibs'
                 should be  : non-native-system ld.so (NOT /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
with  '-nostdlib'

Anyway, I'm going to be compiling the latest glibc from GIT soon , after I
build the latest stable Linux kernel, and will test with / without patch
of attachment #5253 and post results . But Ulrich, please try :
  o build an installation from unmodified source in 32-bit mode
    with LIBDIR=/lib32 
Then :
  $  echo 'int an_int = 1;' > t.c; gcc -m32 -o t.so -shared -nostdlib -fPIC
t.c; ldd t.so
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion
`nlist > 1' failed!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[drepper.fsp at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #23 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper.fsp at gmail dot com> 2011-05-30 16:35:48 UTC ---
I've added a patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[carlos at systemhalted dot org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

--- Comment #24 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2011-08-04 13:09:05 UTC ---
Backported this to 2.13 stable branch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com

--- Comment #25 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[schwab at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com   |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/12454] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!

[fweimer at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.