public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/12547] realloc(p, 0) violates C99
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12547-131-xLjlATBaDv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12547-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12547

--- Comment #14 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
Double-free is not easily detected except in the case where both frees take
place in sequence with no intervening allocations. For example, in a case like
this:

void *p = malloc(n);
realloc(p, 0);
void *q = malloc(n);
free(p);

it's very likely that line 4 will end up freeing the allocation made in line 3.
The resulting state is extremely dangerous and almost always leads to arbitrary
code execution if enough effort is put into the analysis.

Memory leaks, on the other hand, are at worst a DoS issue.

Marking of a feature as "obsolescent" does not grant the implementation
permission to do crazy things like printing messages. It's purely a warning to
applications that the interface may be removed, or its behavior may become
undefined, in future versions of the language standard. Code using it is still
perfectly valid and conforming to the current language standard.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-27 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-06 22:48 [Bug libc/12547] New: " msebor at gmail dot com
2011-03-11  1:11 ` [Bug libc/12547] " drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
2011-03-17 19:03 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-24 17:10 ` eblake at redhat dot com
2011-03-24 17:20 ` eblake at redhat dot com
2011-03-24 17:23 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2011-03-25  0:08 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2011-04-01 22:52 ` eblake at redhat dot com
2011-04-01 23:40 ` drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
2011-04-07 17:06 ` nick at usenix dot org
2014-02-16 17:51 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-27 13:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-02-22 20:49 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-02-23 12:19 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-02-23 18:09 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-02-27 18:11 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2015-02-27 19:11 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message]
2015-08-22 20:32 ` [Bug malloc/12547] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2019-10-03 11:58 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-12547-131-xLjlATBaDv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).