* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-21 2:23 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:00 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libc |stdio
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
2012-02-21 2:23 ` [Bug stdio/12799] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-29 14:00 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-12-11 11:48 ` hannes at stressinduktion dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: siddhesh at redhat dot com @ 2012-10-29 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |siddhesh at redhat dot com
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
2012-02-21 2:23 ` [Bug stdio/12799] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:00 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
@ 2012-12-11 11:48 ` hannes at stressinduktion dot org
2012-12-19 10:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hannes at stressinduktion dot org @ 2012-12-11 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes at stressinduktion dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hannes at stressinduktion
| |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-11 11:48 ` hannes at stressinduktion dot org
@ 2012-12-19 10:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-06-27 13:17 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2012-12-19 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|drepper.fsp at gmail dot |unassigned at sourceware
|com |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-19 10:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-06-27 13:17 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-04-14 0:18 ` eblake at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-27 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 13:17 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-14 0:18 ` eblake at redhat dot com
2020-04-14 0:24 ` eblake at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: eblake at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-14 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Eric Blake <eblake at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |12724
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12724
[Bug 12724] fclose violates POSIX 2008 on seekable input streams
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-14 0:18 ` eblake at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-14 0:24 ` eblake at redhat dot com
2020-04-14 15:59 ` rjones at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: eblake at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-14 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
--- Comment #2 from Eric Blake <eblake at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Eric Blake from comment #1)
> The removal of libio.h is making this bug all the more important to fix, so
> that gnulib can quit mucking around in glibc internals:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2018-03/msg00002.html
>
> Is there a chance that it can be fixed for 2.28?
Still broken in 2020. Similarly, fflush(NULL) should have this effect on all
seekable input streams.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-14 0:24 ` eblake at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-14 15:59 ` rjones at redhat dot com
2020-08-02 23:05 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rjones at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-14 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Richard Jones <rjones at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rjones at redhat dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-14 15:59 ` rjones at redhat dot com
@ 2020-08-02 23:05 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
2020-08-03 18:34 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: chimpatheist at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-02 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
chimpatheist at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chimpatheist at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from chimpatheist at gmail dot com ---
Maybe I'm wrong, but seems that this bug goes out if fflush() make a call to
_IO_switch_to_main_get_area() just before the call to _IO_new_file_sync().
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-02 23:05 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
@ 2020-08-03 18:34 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
2020-08-03 20:03 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
2021-01-22 2:47 ` dancol at dancol dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: chimpatheist at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-03 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
--- Comment #4 from chimpatheist at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to chimpatheist from comment #3)
> Maybe I'm wrong, but seems that this bug goes out if fflush() make a call to
> _IO_switch_to_main_get_area() just before the call to _IO_new_file_sync().
Never mind.
Actually, the bug occurs when fflush() is called and _IO_IN_BACKUP is on, but
just returning to main_get_area doesn't work.
Before switching, we need calculate the difference between fp->_IO_read_end and
fp->_IO_read_ptr and adjust fp->_IO_read_ptr after the switch.
something like this :
fflush(FILE *fp)
{
:
:
if(fp->_flags & _IO_IN_BACKUP)
{
long delta = fp->_IO_read_end - fp->_IO_read_ptr;
_IO_switch_to_main_get_area(fp);
fp->_IO_read_base -= delta;
fp->_IO_read_ptr = fp->_IO_read_base;
}
:
:
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-03 18:34 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
@ 2020-08-03 20:03 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
2021-01-22 2:47 ` dancol at dancol dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: chimpatheist at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-03 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
--- Comment #5 from chimpatheist at gmail dot com ---
More exactly...
if(fp->_flags & _IO_IN_BACKUP)
{
// how many ungetc() ?
long delta1 = fp->_IO_read_end - fp->_IO_read_ptr;
// how many fgetc() before going to backup area ?
long delta2 = fp->_IO_save_base - fp->_IO_buf_base;
// choose the better of the two values
if(delta1 < delta2) delta2 = delta1;
// discard all pushed chars
fp->_IO_read_ptr = fp->_IO_read_end;
// and reset save_base
fp->_IO_save_base -= delta2;
_IO_switch_to_main_get_area(fp);
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug stdio/12799] fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams
2011-05-23 17:14 [Bug libc/12799] New: fflush violates POSIX on seekable input streams eblake at redhat dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-03 20:03 ` chimpatheist at gmail dot com
@ 2021-01-22 2:47 ` dancol at dancol dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dancol at dancol dot org @ 2021-01-22 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
Daniel Colascione <dancol at dancol dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dancol at dancol dot org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread