public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "triegel at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug nptl/13165] pthread_cond_wait() can consume a signal that was sent before it started waiting
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-13165-131-lWiKp1xPFz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-13165-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13165

--- Comment #32 from Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com> 2012-09-21 15:44:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > I disagree strongly that the spec even allows Torvald's interpretation.
> > Torvald's claim is essentially that an implementation can consider an
> > unspecified set of threads beyond those which "have blocked" per the
> > specification of pthread_cond_wait to also "have blocked" on the condition.
> 
> Yes, that's what he claims.

Not quite, as I point out in comment #30.

> Anyway, this whole dispute has been reduced to the question of which threads
> are eligible for wakeup, so I've taken the liberty to post a clarification
> request to the Austin Group, asking them to add explicit text explaining which
> threads should be considered blocked with respect to a pthread_cond_signal()
> call. The clarification request is at
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=609. Torvald, please correct me if have
> inadvertently misrepresented your position.

Thanks.  I have added a note there that summarizes the interpretation that the
current implementation is based on.  Let's see what they think about this
issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-07 19:15 [Bug nptl/13165] New: " mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-21  9:12 ` [Bug nptl/13165] " mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-21 18:19 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-21 22:29 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-22 22:21 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-25 21:33 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-25 21:44 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-26  9:27 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-26 16:20 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-27 10:10 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-27 10:13 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-28  2:07 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-28  2:08 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-28  9:03 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2011-09-28 16:06 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2011-09-28 21:00 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-19 15:15 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-19 15:21 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-19 17:23 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-09-20 10:28 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-20 10:43 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 11:05 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-20 11:23 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 11:58 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 12:46 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-20 12:49 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-20 16:21 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 18:39 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-09-20 19:48 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-09-20 20:31 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-09-21  8:04 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-09-21  8:05 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-09-21  8:54 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-09-21 15:45 ` triegel at redhat dot com [this message]
2012-10-18  6:26 ` mihaylov.mihail at gmail dot com
2012-10-18 12:25 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-10-24 20:26 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2012-10-25  4:08 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-01-19 16:19 ` scot4spam at yahoo dot com
2014-02-16 17:45 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-03-28  9:23 ` dancol at dancol dot org
2014-05-28 19:44 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-27 12:09 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-08-18 21:22 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2014-08-18 21:42 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-08-26 15:29 ` kkersten at cray dot com
2017-01-01 21:32 ` triegel at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-13165-131-lWiKp1xPFz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).