public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/13171] New: missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h>
@ 2011-09-08 20:43 eblake at redhat dot com
2011-09-09 1:46 ` [Bug libc/13171] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-06-27 12:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: eblake at redhat dot com @ 2011-09-08 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13171
Bug #: 13171
Summary: missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h>
Product: glibc
Version: 2.14
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
ReportedBy: eblake@redhat.com
Classification: Unclassified
According to POSIX 2008, crypt() and encrypt() should unconditionally be
declared in <unistd.h> by any implementation claiming to provide XSI. Yet:
$ printf '#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L\n#include <unistd.h>\n' \
| gcc -E - | grep crypt
$
shows 0 hits, and it takes _GNU_SOURCE to convince glibc that we want those
declarations. The same is true of POSIX 2001. Likewise for setkey() in
<stdlib.h>.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-09/msg00096.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/13171] missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h> 2011-09-08 20:43 [Bug libc/13171] New: missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h> eblake at redhat dot com @ 2011-09-09 1:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2014-06-27 12:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: bugdal at aerifal dot cx @ 2011-09-09 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13171 Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugdal at aerifal dot cx Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> 2011-09-09 01:45:38 UTC --- The XSI option is only usable when _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined with an appropriate value (700 for SUSv4/POSIX 2008, 600 for SUSv3). _POSIX_C_SOURCE does not request the XSI option. This is in accordance with: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_02_01 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13171] missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h> 2011-09-08 20:43 [Bug libc/13171] New: missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h> eblake at redhat dot com 2011-09-09 1:46 ` [Bug libc/13171] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx @ 2014-06-27 12:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-27 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13171 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |security- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-27 12:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-09-08 20:43 [Bug libc/13171] New: missing XSI declarations, such as crypt in <unistd.h> eblake at redhat dot com 2011-09-09 1:46 ` [Bug libc/13171] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2014-06-27 12:07 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).