* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-24 14:07 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-02-24 17:44 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: carlos at systemhalted dot org @ 2012-02-24 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos at systemhalted dot
| |org
--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2012-02-24 14:06:49 UTC ---
Kai,
Would you mind writing a small test case that shows the behaviour?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
2012-02-24 14:07 ` [Bug libc/13740] " carlos at systemhalted dot org
@ 2012-02-24 17:44 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-02-28 8:36 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: carlos at systemhalted dot org @ 2012-02-24 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
2012-02-24 14:07 ` [Bug libc/13740] " carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-02-24 17:44 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
@ 2012-02-28 8:36 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
2012-02-28 8:39 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: freeordie.k at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-28 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
--- Comment #2 from Kai Kang <freeordie.k at gmail dot com> 2012-02-28 08:36:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 6254
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6254
Test struct aiocb with invalid aio_lio_opcode for lio_list()
Output:
ret is -1, error_code is 22, return code is -1
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-28 8:36 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-28 8:39 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
2012-02-28 16:16 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: freeordie.k at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-28 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
--- Comment #3 from Kai Kang <freeordie.k at gmail dot com> 2012-02-28 08:38:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Kai,
>
> Would you mind writing a small test case that shows the behaviour?
Carlos,
I simply test case from POSIX, but I not sure that is you requires.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-28 8:39 ` freeordie.k at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-28 16:16 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2014-06-26 15:16 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:07 ` [Bug librt/13740] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: carlos at systemhalted dot org @ 2012-02-28 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
--- Comment #4 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2012-02-28 16:16:02 UTC ---
Kai,
I'm looking for a test case that shows that glibc does not return an error code
on invalid input. In your example the input is invalid, and the return is
correct EINVAL=22.
The test case should return 0 if it passes e.g. You passed in an invalid value
and got back the correct error code.
The test case should return 1 if it fails e.g. you passed in an invalid value
and got back no error code or the wrong error code.
Does that help clarify what I'm looking for?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-28 16:16 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
@ 2014-06-26 15:16 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:07 ` [Bug librt/13740] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-26 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug librt/13740] lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set
2012-02-24 9:25 [Bug libc/13740] New: lio_listio: when pass aiocb with a invalid aio_lio_opcode, __error_code is not set freeordie.k at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-26 15:16 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2015-08-27 22:07 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-27 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libc |librt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread