From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29185 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2012 09:12:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 29173 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2012 09:12:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TLD_CHINA X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO sourceware.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:31 +0000 From: "weijun.huang at cs2c dot com.cn" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug ports/13778] GLIBC_2.1(MIPS ported) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: ports X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: weijun.huang at cs2c dot com.cn X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: carlos at systemhalted dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00547.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13778 =E9=BB=84=E5=8D=AB=E5=86=9B changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #6 from =E9=BB=84=E5=8D=AB=E5=86=9B 2012-02-29 09:12:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > There is a bug in your old glibc if it needs GLIBC 2.1. There has never b= een a > working glibc release with version 2.1 in it and thus if you have it, som= ething > went wrong in your previous installation. >=20 > If LSB demands GLIBC_2.1, then LSB is wrong and needs to be fixed. My glibc version is 2.12.1(5/2010), I think it not old, the newest is 2.15(2/2012) for fedora18.=20 such as symbol popen only two versions: GLIBC_2.0 and GLIBC_2.1 provide by glibc. Ported glibc(mips patch), symbol popen versions is GLIBC_2.0 and GLIBC_2.2. I think either modify LSB check popen version GLIBC_2.2(not GLIBC_2.1) or modify glibc mips patch to support GLIBC_2.1. I like the latter, but do not what to do. --=20 Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.