public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "nagle at sitetruth dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug network/13935] getaddrinfo NXDOMAIN hijack exploit for hosts with two-component hostnames Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:51:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-13935-131-TBWHlZgEy0@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-13935-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13935 --- Comment #2 from John Nagle <nagle at sitetruth dot com> 2012-04-04 02:50:46 UTC --- SOME HISTORY This problem was addressed back in 1993 in RFC 1535, "A Security Problem and Proposed Correction With Widely Deployed DNS Software". Back then, DNS resolution involved chopping off one element at a time of the local hosts' domain and appending that to the query until a match was found. This allowed attacks on domains with more than two elements. That's where the current restrictions come from. RFC 1535 says "At a minimum, DNS resolvers must honor the BOUNDARY between local and public administration, by limiting any search lists to locally- administered portions of the Domain Name space." It then goes on: "DNS Name resolver software SHOULD NOT use implicit search lists in attempts to resolve partial names into absolute FQDNs other than the hosts's immediate parent domain. Resolvers which continue to use implicit search lists MUST limit their scope to locally administered sub-domains." Those two statement are in conflict when a host has a name such as "example.com". The "immediate parent domain" is "com", but it is not a "locally administered subdomain". Since the second sentence is a MUST, while the first sentence is a SHOULD, the second sentence controls. Thus, to conform to RFC 1535, the search path should never default to a TLD. glibc is not in compliance. That RFC was written in 1993, before domains were ever offered for sale. A world in which most domains were second level was not envisioned at the time. That's probably why the authors of the RFC didn't think of this. WORKAROUNDS, FAILURE OF This is a tough problem to work around without changing host names. Adding commands to /etc/resolv.conf tends to cause problems, because, in modern Linux systems, that file is usually generated by system administration software. Editing /etc/resolv.conf is not particularly helpful, anyway. Adding a blank "search" command does not delete the implicit search path. (That behavior comes from lines 267-268 in res_init.c, which, for a blank "search" line, does nothing. The code in that area seems to be set up so that there is always an alternate search path of some kind, either from SEARCH statement in resolv.conf, a DOMAIN statement, an environment variable, or the host name of the host. Nor does setting "ndots:0" have that effect. Setting "domain" in /etc/resolv.conf to a value with an invalid TLD might work, but could confuse other parts of the system. "no_tld_query" only applies to inputs with no dots (I think) so that doesn't help, either. EFFECT The effect of all this is that you can't trust "getaddrinfo" or "gethostbyname" to do an honest DNS lookup. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 2:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-01 20:16 [Bug network/13935] New: " nagle at sitetruth dot com 2012-04-01 21:06 ` [Bug network/13935] " nagle at sitetruth dot com 2012-04-01 22:20 ` nagle at sitetruth dot com 2012-04-02 17:35 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2012-04-04 2:51 ` nagle at sitetruth dot com [this message] 2012-08-24 10:48 ` scorneli at redhat dot com 2012-08-24 16:46 ` nagle at sitetruth dot com 2012-08-24 17:31 ` law at redhat dot com 2012-11-03 17:01 ` karme at karme dot de 2013-09-12 8:35 ` berend.de.schouwer at gmail dot com 2014-02-16 19:42 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com 2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org 2014-06-25 11:24 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-06-22 13:40 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-06-22 13:43 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2020-06-22 13:44 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-06-22 13:58 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-13935-131-TBWHlZgEy0@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).