public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
@ 2012-05-02 9:10 jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-05-02 15:32 ` [Bug math/14048] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jkummerow at chromium dot org @ 2012-05-02 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Bug #: 14048
Summary: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?)
denormalized inputs
Product: glibc
Version: 2.15
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: math
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: jkummerow@chromium.org
Classification: Unclassified
I've come across a case where fmod() does not return the expected result.
Reduced repro:
------
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
double x = 2.225073858507201e-308;
double y = 5e-324;
double z = fmod(x, y);
// printf("result: %g\n", z); // see [1] below.
std::cout << "result: " << z << std::endl;
return 0;
}
------
Expected result: 0
Actual result: -nan
I can repro the bug on both a Gentoo (gcc-4.5.3, kernel 3.3.4) and an Ubuntu
Precise (gcc-4.6.3, kernel 3.2.5) system, which both have glibc-2.15, and both
are x86_64. It works correctly on Ubuntu Lucid (glibc-2.11, gcc-4.4.2, kernel
2.6.38.8).
Further, it works correctly when compiling with either of -O1, -O2, -O3. It
also works correctly when removing the "std::cout << ..." and "#include
<iostream>" lines, and using the "printf(..." line (marked [1]) instead.
I've looked at the generated machine code. In the buggy case, glibc's fmod is
called directly:
main():
400744: 55 push rbp
400745: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
400748: 48 83 ec 20 sub rsp,0x20
40074c: 48 b8 ff ff ff ff ff movabs rax,0xfffffffffffff
400753: ff 0f 00
400756: 48 89 45 f8 mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rax
40075a: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
40075f: 48 89 45 f0 mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rax
400763: f2 0f 10 4d f0 movsd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
400768: f2 0f 10 45 f8 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8]
40076d: e8 de fe ff ff call 400650 <fmod@plt>
400772: f2 0f 11 45 e8 movsd QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18],xmm0
400777: f2 0f 10 45 e8 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18]
40077c: bf dc 08 40 00 mov edi,0x4008dc
400781: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
400786: e8 75 fe ff ff call 400600 <printf@plt>
40078b: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0
400790: c9 leave
400791: c3 ret
When I do any of the changes that make it work (e.g. remove the iostream
include), g++ decides to inline an FPU-based implementation of fmod (which
seems to work as expected) and only calls out to glibc as a fallback:
main():
400604: 55 push rbp
400605: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
400608: 48 83 ec 40 sub rsp,0x40
40060c: 48 b8 ff ff ff ff ff movabs rax,0xfffffffffffff
400613: ff 0f 00
400616: 48 89 45 f8 mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rax
40061a: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
40061f: 48 89 45 f0 mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rax
400623: dd 45 f8 fld QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8]
400626: dd 45 f0 fld QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
400629: d9 c0 fld st(0)
40062b: d9 c2 fld st(2)
40062d: d9 f8 fprem
40062f: df e0 fnstsw ax
400631: f6 c4 04 test ah,0x4
400634: 75 f7 jne 40062d <main+0x29>
400636: dd d9 fstp st(1)
400638: dd 5d d8 fstp QWORD PTR [rbp-0x28]
40063b: f2 0f 10 45 d8 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x28]
400640: 66 0f 2e c0 ucomisd xmm0,xmm0
400644: 7a 06 jp 40064c <main+0x48>
400646: 66 0f 2e c0 ucomisd xmm0,xmm0
40064a: 74 17 je 400663 <main+0x5f>
40064c: dd 5d c8 fstp QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38]
40064f: f2 0f 10 4d c8 movsd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38]
400654: dd 5d c8 fstp QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38]
400657: f2 0f 10 45 c8 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38]
40065c: e8 af fe ff ff call 400510 <fmod@plt>
400661: eb 04 jmp 400667 <main+0x63>
400663: dd d8 fstp st(0)
400665: dd d8 fstp st(0)
400667: f2 0f 11 45 e8 movsd QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18],xmm0
40066c: f2 0f 10 45 e8 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18]
400671: bf 7c 07 40 00 mov edi,0x40077c
400676: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
40067b: e8 70 fe ff ff call 4004f0 <printf@plt>
400680: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0
400685: c9 leave
400686: c3 ret
So, it looks to me like glibc's fmod() doesn't handle this case (max
denormalized double modulo min denormalized double) correctly. Am I barking up
the wrong tree?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
@ 2012-05-02 15:32 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-05-03 20:39 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugdal at aerifal dot cx @ 2012-05-02 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> 2012-05-02 15:31:45 UTC ---
Using the -fno-builtin option to gcc should make it easier to test/reproduce
this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-05-02 15:32 ` [Bug math/14048] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
@ 2012-05-03 20:39 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-06-01 19:10 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jkummerow at chromium dot org @ 2012-05-03 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #2 from jkummerow at chromium dot org 2012-05-03 20:38:51 UTC ---
Indeed, with -fno-builtin the provided test case fails regardless of -O{1,2,3}.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-05-02 15:32 ` [Bug math/14048] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-05-03 20:39 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
@ 2012-06-01 19:10 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-02 12:56 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-01 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |glibc_2.15
CC| |carlos at systemhalted dot
| |org
--- Comment #3 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-01 19:09:50 UTC ---
Fixed for 2.16 by:
commit c5bfe3d5ba29d36563f1e4bd4f8d7336093ee6fc
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri Jun 1 19:05:46 2012 +0000
Fix fmod for subnormals (bug 14048).
Carlos, I think this should go on 2.15 branch as well.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-01 19:10 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-02 12:56 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-06-08 10:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jkummerow at chromium dot org @ 2012-06-02 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #4 from jkummerow at chromium dot org 2012-06-02 12:56:07 UTC ---
Thanks!
I have recompiled glibc-2.15 on my machine with that patch applied manually and
can confirm that it fixes the issue I was seeing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-02 12:56 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
@ 2012-06-08 10:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-08 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #5 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-08 10:34:58 UTC ---
Carlos, the 2.15 backport should also include
commit 1b671feb6115afbc90a7b37be4929d3e0394f311
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Jun 5 21:31:24 2012 -0300
Fix for wrong ldbl128-ibm fmodl commit
commit 34ae0b3270c67cae0c54ac98b693fdf7d010a206
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Jun 5 10:13:41 2012 -0300
Fix ldbl128ibm fmodl for subnormals.
to avoid the new tests failing for powerpc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-08 10:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-25 21:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:41 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-25 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #6 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-25 21:39:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 6481
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6481
Backport 1/3
Carlos, please review this series of three backports for 2.15 branch. Tested
x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 21:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-25 21:41 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-25 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #7 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-25 21:41:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 6482
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6482
Backport 2/3
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 21:41 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-25 21:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:52 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-25 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #8 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-25 21:42:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 6483
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6483
Backport 3/3
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 21:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-25 21:52 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-06-25 22:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: carlos_odonell at mentor dot com @ 2012-06-25 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos_odonell at mentor
| |dot com
--- Comment #9 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> 2012-06-25 21:52:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 6481 [details]
> Backport 1/3
>
> Carlos, please review this series of three backports for 2.15 branch. Tested
> x86_64.
All three backports look good to me for 2.15.
My only worry is that we break the testsuite for yet another target.
Shall we drop the testsuite addition from the backport?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 21:52 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
@ 2012-06-25 22:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2012-06-25 22:22 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2012-06-25 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2012-06-25 22:09:16 UTC ---
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, carlos_odonell at mentor dot com wrote:
> Shall we drop the testsuite addition from the backport?
The most conservative backport would be just patch 1/3, without the
testsuite addition - 1/3 is fixing the regression in 2.15 (a regression
introduced by the addition of the wordsize-64 version), the other patches
are fixing a failure that showed up for powerpc with the new testcases but
as far as I know that powerpc failure is not a regression.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 22:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2012-06-25 22:22 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-06-25 23:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: carlos_odonell at mentor dot com @ 2012-06-25 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #11 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> 2012-06-25 22:22:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, carlos_odonell at mentor dot com wrote:
>
> > Shall we drop the testsuite addition from the backport?
>
> The most conservative backport would be just patch 1/3, without the
> testsuite addition - 1/3 is fixing the regression in 2.15 (a regression
> introduced by the addition of the wordsize-64 version), the other patches
> are fixing a failure that showed up for powerpc with the new testcases but
> as far as I know that powerpc failure is not a regression.
The Power failure is still a failure and should be fixed.
Please checkin all three patches *without* the testsuite addition.
I want to avoid people working with a stable branch having testsuite failures
show up out of thin air because we fixed a bug. That's OK for trunk, but not OK
for a stable branch. The new testsuite failure is difficult and time-consuming
for non-experts to diagnose. We hide this by fixing the bug, and using the
regression test to verify the fix, but then dropping the testcase from the
backport.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 22:22 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
@ 2012-06-25 23:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16 19:32 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-25 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-25 23:16:00 UTC ---
Fixed 2.15 (without testcase) by:
commit b640404bd8c9a281502ccc87ab2ed640c9b4c085
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Jun 5 21:31:24 2012 -0300
Fix for wrong ldbl128-ibm fmodl commit
(cherry picked from commit 1b671feb6115afbc90a7b37be4929d3e0394f311)
commit c95a1e5f35fa099eba9b2820b461edaaa7765539
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Jun 5 10:13:41 2012 -0300
Fix ldbl128ibm fmodl for subnormals.
(cherry picked from commit 34ae0b3270c67cae0c54ac98b693fdf7d010a206)
commit 2676061a91c99fa0b2633ceee881ea5bc31de4c2
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri Jun 1 19:05:46 2012 +0000
Fix fmod for subnormals (bug 14048).
(cherry picked from commit c5bfe3d5ba29d36563f1e4bd4f8d7336093ee6fc)
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 23:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-16 19:32 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:46 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-25 11:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com @ 2014-02-16 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-16 19:32 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
@ 2014-05-28 19:46 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-25 11:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: schwab at sourceware dot org @ 2014-05-28 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14048] fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-28 19:46 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
@ 2014-06-25 11:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-25 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-25 11:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-02 9:10 [Bug math/14048] New: fmod() incorrectly returns NaN for (some?) denormalized inputs jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-05-02 15:32 ` [Bug math/14048] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-05-03 20:39 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-06-01 19:10 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-02 12:56 ` jkummerow at chromium dot org
2012-06-08 10:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:41 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-25 21:52 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-06-25 22:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2012-06-25 22:22 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-06-25 23:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16 19:32 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:46 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-25 11:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).