From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5195 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2015 13:44:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5099 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2015 13:44:55 -0000 From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/14095] Review / update collation data from Unicode / ISO 14651 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.15 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14095 Carlos O'Donell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlos at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #2) > Yes, there is a lot of detailed, careful work involved in analysis of the > history of the current collation data in order to produce a justified > analysis of those questions with recommendations for how to use data from > current ISO 14651. Given the responsibility to users to avoid > regressions, we need to understand what changes would be involved in such > an update, and satisfy ourselves that they are good changes rather than > regressions, as part of making such an update. Contributors willing to > help with that careful analysis are welcome. I agree completely with Joseph. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.