public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
@ 2012-06-27 17:14 arjan at linux dot intel.com
  2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: arjan at linux dot intel.com @ 2012-06-27 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

             Bug #: 14305
           Summary: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not
                    sufficient for libtirpc
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: nis
        AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: arjan@linux.intel.com
                CC: kukuk@suse.de
    Classification: Unclassified


trying to use libtirpc with the 2.16 glibc (candidate), glibc compiled with
--enable-obsolete-rpc:

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../lib64/libtirpc.so:
undefined reference to `svc_auth_none'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../lib64/libtirpc.so:
undefined reference to `_svcauth_none'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../lib64/libtirpc.so:
undefined reference to `_des_crypt_call'

these symbols seem hidden, and previously, the old rpc stuff unhid them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
@ 2012-06-27 18:23 ` aj at suse dot de
  2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aj at suse dot de
   Target Milestone|---                         |2.16

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:23:01 UTC ---
Could you add a simple test program, please? This does not show up in package
building in distributions AFAIK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
  2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
  2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:28:53 UTC ---
Arjan, this smells like a recent libtirpc bug, please check the libtirpc
mailing list, e.g. the following email:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E00E4E6.6020808%40RedHat.com&forum_name=libtirpc-devel

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
  2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
  2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
  2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: arjan at linux dot intel.com @ 2012-06-27 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

--- Comment #3 from Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux dot intel.com> 2012-06-27 18:30:44 UTC ---
this shows up if you try to build nfs-utils against libtirpc
I'm sure other distros decide to not use libtirpc because of that...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
@ 2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
  2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vapier at gentoo dot org

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:31:50 UTC ---
Mike, since I reference your email/patch and openSUSE uses that patch: Could
you check this, please?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
  2012-07-24  4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

--- Comment #5 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:35:02 UTC ---
openSUSE builds nfs-utils against libtirpc - but we're using the patch I
referenced.

check:
http://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libtirpc&project=Base%3ASystem

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-07-24  4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
  2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: carlos_odonell at mentor dot com @ 2012-07-24  4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |carlos_odonell at mentor
                   |                            |dot com
              Flags|                            |review?(vapier at gentoo
                   |                            |dot org)

--- Comment #6 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> 2012-07-24 04:16:57 UTC ---
Using reviewer flags to ask Mike to help review this issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-07-24  4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
@ 2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
  2012-08-12  5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
  2014-06-18  4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: vapier at gentoo dot org @ 2012-08-11 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

--- Comment #7 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> 2012-08-11 18:17:32 UTC ---
yes, this is a bug in libtirpc-0.2.2.  pretty sure it's not (directly) related
to our rpc configure options since that test+report was done against
<=glibc-2.13 which is before the rpc stuff was removed from glibc.

in Gentoo, i've deleted the building of des_crypt.c in libtirpc, and we seem to
be able to link nfs-utils against it (although i haven't verified that *all*
symbols nfs-utils needs are being satisfied by libtirpc).  if they aren't,
that's a bug for libtirpc to deal with.

if anyone is knowledgeable in sunrpc (i would not claim to be), it seems like
the libtirpc guys are short handed on getting it to be a full replacement for
what is provided by glibc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
@ 2012-08-12  5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
  2014-06-18  4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-08-12  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #8 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-08-12 05:04:57 UTC ---
Marking as WONTFIX since this is a bug not in glibc but in libtirpc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
  2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-08-12  5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2014-06-18  4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-18  4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-18  4:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-07-24  4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-08-12  5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-06-18  4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).