* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
@ 2012-06-27 18:23 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aj at suse dot de
Target Milestone|--- |2.16
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:23:01 UTC ---
Could you add a simple test program, please? This does not show up in package
building in distributions AFAIK.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:28:53 UTC ---
Arjan, this smells like a recent libtirpc bug, please check the libtirpc
mailing list, e.g. the following email:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E00E4E6.6020808%40RedHat.com&forum_name=libtirpc-devel
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
2012-06-27 18:23 ` [Bug nis/14305] " aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:29 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: arjan at linux dot intel.com @ 2012-06-27 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #3 from Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux dot intel.com> 2012-06-27 18:30:44 UTC ---
this shows up if you try to build nfs-utils against libtirpc
I'm sure other distros decide to not use libtirpc because of that...
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-27 18:30 ` arjan at linux dot intel.com
@ 2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vapier at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:31:50 UTC ---
Mike, since I reference your email/patch and openSUSE uses that patch: Could
you check this, please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-27 18:32 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-07-24 4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-06-27 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-06-27 18:35:02 UTC ---
openSUSE builds nfs-utils against libtirpc - but we're using the patch I
referenced.
check:
http://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libtirpc&project=Base%3ASystem
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-27 18:35 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-07-24 4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: carlos_odonell at mentor dot com @ 2012-07-24 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos_odonell at mentor
| |dot com
Flags| |review?(vapier at gentoo
| |dot org)
--- Comment #6 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> 2012-07-24 04:16:57 UTC ---
Using reviewer flags to ask Mike to help review this issue.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-24 4:17 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
@ 2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-08-12 5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-06-18 4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: vapier at gentoo dot org @ 2012-08-11 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #7 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> 2012-08-11 18:17:32 UTC ---
yes, this is a bug in libtirpc-0.2.2. pretty sure it's not (directly) related
to our rpc configure options since that test+report was done against
<=glibc-2.13 which is before the rpc stuff was removed from glibc.
in Gentoo, i've deleted the building of des_crypt.c in libtirpc, and we seem to
be able to link nfs-utils against it (although i haven't verified that *all*
symbols nfs-utils needs are being satisfied by libtirpc). if they aren't,
that's a bug for libtirpc to deal with.
if anyone is knowledgeable in sunrpc (i would not claim to be), it seems like
the libtirpc guys are short handed on getting it to be a full replacement for
what is provided by glibc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-11 18:17 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
@ 2012-08-12 5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-06-18 4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-08-12 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-08-12 05:04:57 UTC ---
Marking as WONTFIX since this is a bug not in glibc but in libtirpc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug nis/14305] 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc
2012-06-27 17:14 [Bug nis/14305] New: 2.16(candidate) --enable-obsolete-rpc is not sufficient for libtirpc arjan at linux dot intel.com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-12 5:05 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2014-06-18 4:31 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-18 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread